IMPROVING PHYSICS LEARNING OUTCOME THROUGH COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL OF GROUP INVESTIGATION TYPE AND STUDENT LEARNING MOTIVATION IN SMAN 1 PESANGGARAN-BANYUWANGI

  • Erni Wijayanti STIE Mandala Jember
  • Muhammad Firdaus STIE Mandala Jember
  • Hary Sulaksono STIE Mandala Jember

Abstract

This research aims to determine the effect of GI type cooperative learning model and learning motivation, as well as the influence of interaction model of cooperative learning type GI and motivation to physics learning outcome. The population in this research is the students of class XI IPA SMAN 1 Pesanggaran-Banyuwangi, which consists of two classes of classes that are homogeneous, the control class and experimental class. The data used in this research are primary data collected from pre-test and post-test for learning outcome, and questionnaires for student motivation data. The instrument before it is tested has been tested for its validity and reliability. The statistical test uses two-way Anova analysis method with the help of SPSS computer program. The results showed that (1) there were significant differences between groups of students using cooperative type of GI learning model with conventional learning model on Physics learning Outcome. This conclusion is based on the result of two-way Anova analysis, the value (F Count) 13.491> (F table) 3,13 at significance level (α) 0,05 and P value (Sig.) 0.000 <(α) 0,005. (2) there is a significant difference of influence between high motivated group of students with low motivation toward Physics learning Outcome This conclusion is based on the result of analysis of two path Anova analysis, that is value (F Count) 14,908 <3,13 (F table) on level Significance (α) 0.05 and P value (Sig) 0.000 <(α) 0.05. (3) There is no interaction of GI type cooperative learning model and learning motivation toward student physics learning result at SMAN 1 Pesanggaran. This conclusion is based on two-way Anova analysis test result (F Count) 0,036 <(F Table) 3,13 at significance level (α) 0,05, and P value (Sig) 0,851 <(α) 0,05. From the results of this research teachers are required to always innovate in choosing a model of learning. Due to selection of learning models in accordance with the conditions of learners and schools, it will be able to improve learning outcome. One of the learning models that can improve learning outcome is by using the GI model.

References

Arikunto. 2002. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan R & D. Bumi Aksara: Jakarta.

Arikunto. Suharsimi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian.Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Artini (2015) tentang Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Group Investigation Untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar IPA Pada Siswa Kelas VI SD Inpres 1 Tondo. Jurnal Penelitian Magister Pendidikan Sains Pascasarjana Universitas Tadulako http://jurnal.untad.ac.id/jurnal/ index.php/MitraSains/article/view/4135/3075. Diakses pada 16/09/2016.

Astiti. 2012. Pengaruh Model Pembelajarn Kooperatif Tipe STAD dan Motivasi Outcome Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPS Siswa Kelas VII SMP Negeri 2 Semarapura-Singaraja.Pascasarjana-Undiksa-Bali. http://pasca.undiksha.ac.id/e-journal/index.php/jurnal_ep/article/view/31. Diakses pada 16/09/2016

Azwar, Saeffudin. 2000. Penyusunan Skala Psikologi. Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar

Burhanudin, S. 2006. Model Pembelajaran Group Investigasi. Available : www.geocities.com. Diakses pada 16/09/2016.

Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 1990. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta. Balai Pustaka.

Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2003. Model-model Pembelajaran Dirjen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta. PGSM.

Ibrahim. 2000. Pembelajaran Kooperatif. Surabaya. Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Kushendar, Denny Mahendra. 2010. Pengertian Outcome Belajar. Jurnal Hasil Riset.

Kustiani. 2013. Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Group Investigation dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas V SD 1 Jurang Kabupaten Kudus. Jurnal Penelitian Universitas Muria-Kudus. Diakses pada 16/09/2016.

Lie, A. 2002. Cooperative Learning. Jakarta. Penerbit Grasindo.

Ridwan. 2006. Skala Pengukuran Variabel-variabel Penelitian. Bandung. Alphabeta.

Santoso, Purbayu Budi. 2005. Analisa Statistik dengan Microsoft Exel dan SPSS. Yogyakarta. Andi.

Santrock, J W. 2004. Educational Pshycology, New York, Mc Graw-Hill.

Sardiman, A.M. 2011 Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar, Jakarta. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Slavin, Robert,E. 2008. Cooperative Learning Teori, Riset dan Praktik. Bandung. Nusa Media.

Suciati, Prasetya Irawan. 2001. Teori Belajar dan Motivasi, Jakarta. PAU-PPAI Universitas Terbuka.

Sugiyono. 2012 Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung. Alfabeta

Suryobroto. 2009.Metode Pembelajaran Konvensional. Jurnal-Kompasiana.com. www.kompasiana.com/m.anasjurnal-artikel. Diakses pada 16/09/2016.

Sutama. 2007. “Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Group Investigation untuk Mengembangkan Kreatifitas Mahasiswa”. Varidika. 19 (1): 1-14. Jurnal. pdii.lipi.go.id/admin/jurnal/19107114.pdf.

Trihendradi, C. 2012. SPSS 20 Step By Step Analisis Data Statistik. Yogyakarta. Penerbit ANDI.

Tsay, Mina and Brady, Miranda. 2010 “A case research of cooperative learning and communication pedagogy” in Journal of the scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Vol 10, No 2. Available at

Warpala, IWS.2011. Melaksanakan Tindak Pembelajaran Bermakna: Merajut Inovasi dan Menuai Prestasi, Makalah disampaikan pada penataran Guru muda pola 90jam Undiksha. Singaraja.

Published
2019-07-29
Section
Articles